OBJECTIVE: To determine body image disturbance and relationship satisfaction between obese and non-obese ple consisted of 100 participants. Data was collected through purposive sampling technique from different gyms and nutrient-clinics of Johar Town, Faisal Town and Model Town of Lahore city. Educated females having minimum education level of intermediate belonging to upper and middle-class families were recruited. The shortened form of Body Shape Questionnaire and Relationship Assessment Scale were administered, in addition to collecting demographic information through a semi structure performa. Independent sample t-test and Pearson’s Product-Moment Correlation was used in the analysis of the data, using SPSS v.21.RESULTS: Most of obese and non-obese married women (n=) were in the age range of 25-35 years and 30-40 years respectively with mean age of 34 years for obese and 33 years for non-obese married women. Husband’s mean age for obese and non-obese was 39 years and 38 years respectively. Almost all the non-obese (n=) while most of the obese (n=) married women were having education level of 16 or more while almost all the non-obese (n=) were working women and most (n=) of the obese were house wives. Thirty-two () non-obese were having 2-6 years while (n=) obese married women were having 7-9 years of marriage duration. A significant relationship was shown at the level of body image disturbance (p<0.000) and marital satisfaction (p<0.000) between obese and non-obese married women.CONCLUSION: Obesity has significant impact on body image and relationship satisfaction in married women.
Article Information
- ACM
- ACS
- APA
- ABNT
- il
- Harvard
- IEEE
- MLA
- Turabian
People are permitted and you will encouraged to blog post the things they’re doing on the web (age.g., within the organization repositories otherwise on their website) ahead of and within the submitting processes, as it can lead to productive transfers, along with before and you will greater citation out-of penned work.
Recommendations
Community Wellness Providers. Being obese and you may overweight 2016. Federal Institute of Diabetic issues and you can Digestion and Renal Diseases. Fat and you can being obese statistics [Internet] 2012. Burkhauser Rv, Cawley J. Past Bmi: the worth of much more precise actions away from fatness and you can carrying excess fat from inside the personal technology lookup. J Wellness Econ 2008;27(2):519-29. DOI: /j. Crowther Nj, Norris SA. The present day hips width cut section useful for the fresh diagnosis from metabolic disorder during the sub-Saharan African females is not appropriate. PLoS One to 2012;7(11):e48883. DOI: /journal. Goswami S, Sachdeva S, Sachdeva R. Human anatomy picture satisfaction certainly one of girls youngsters. Ind Psychiatry J 2012;21(2):168-72. DOI: -53. Ng M, Fleming T, Robinson Yards, Thomson B, Graetz N, Margono C, ainsi que al. Internationally, local, and you will federal incidence from over weight and you can obesity in kids and you will adults during 1980-2013: a health-related data into the Internationally Burden regarding State Data 2013.
The newest Lancet 2014 Will get 30;384(9945):766-81. DOI: /S0140-6736(14)60460-8. Jernigan Have always been, Tergas AI, Satin AJ, Fader An. Carrying excess fat management for the gynecologic cancer tumors survivors: seller means and you may attitudes. Was J Obstet Gynecol 20. Sallis JF, Owen Letter, Fische EB. Environmental varieties of health decisions. From inside the Glanz K, Rimer BK, Viswanath K, editors. Wellness Behavior and you may Wellness Degree: Principle, Search, and practice. JOSSEY-Bass, a good wiley imprint. John Wiley & Sons, San francisco, Us. Bandura A. A social cognitive concept off identification. In Pervin L, John O, writers. Manual regarding identity. Guilford Books, New york, Usa. Sarwer DB, Lavery M, Spitzer JC. A peek at the latest matchmaking between significant being obese, standard of living, and you may sexual mode. Obes Surg 2012 Annual percentage rate;22(4):668-76. DOI: /sstep 1step one695-0step one2-0588-step one. Paeratakul S, White MA, Williamson Da, Ryan DH, Bray GA.
Intercourse, race/ethnicity, socioeconomic updates, and Bmi in terms of care about?impression regarding obese. Obes Res 20. McNulty JK, Neff La, Karney BR. Past initially interest: actual attractiveness within the newlywed Feb;22(1):135-43. DOI: -. Arcelus J, Yates A good, Whiteley R. Personal matchmaking, clinical and sub-medical restaurants conditions: A glance at the latest literature. Sex Relatives Ther 20. Stokes Roentgen. Frederick-Recascino C. Ladies’ perceived system image connections which have personal contentment. J Female Aging 2003;15(1):17-31. DOI:/J074v15n01_03. Zawawi JA. Matchmaking anywhere between Body mass index, Muscles Image Dissatisfaction and you can Emotional Worry among Gym Lady Profiles within the Zarqa-Jordan. Int J Hum Soc Sci 2014;4(1):11-20. Evans C, Dolan B. Physique survey: Derivation away from reduced “solution versions”. Int J Eat Disord 1993;13(3):315-21. DOI: -108X(199304)13:step 3 step 3. CO;2-step three. Tips An effective, Fidanza F, Karvonen MJ, Kimura N, Taylor HL.
Indicator from relative pounds and you may carrying excess fat. Int J Epidemiol 2014;43(3):655-65. DOI: /ije/dyu058. Hendrick SS. A simple way of measuring dating pleasure. J 1988;50(1):93-8. DOI:31. AL-Otaibi HH, Naseef SL, Raouf TA. Looks picture disappointment, pounds status and you may exercise one of a sample from college students during the Saudi Arabia. Eating Nutr Sci 2013;4(6):616-twenty five. DOI:/fns. Seligman MEP. Confident fitness. Appl Psychol 2008;57(1):3-18. DOI: /j. Yamamiya Y, Dollars TF, Melnyk SE, Posavac, High definition, Posavac SS. Ladies contact with narrow-and-beautiful news photographs: Muscles visualize results of media-better internalization and you will effect-prevention treatments. Human body Photo 2004;2(1):74-80. DOI:/j. Lovell GP, Gordon JA, Mueller MB, Mulgrew K, Sharman Roentgen. Fulfillment out of Very first Psychological Needs, Self-Calculated Take action Motivation, and Mental Really-Staying in Moms and dads Exercising in group-Created As opposed to Private-Oriented Contexts. Healthcare Girls Int 2016;37(5):568-82. DOI:333. O’Brien KS, Latner JD, Ebneter D, Huntsman JA.
Obesity discrimination: the fresh role from appearance, private ideology, and you may anti-lbs bias. Int J Obes (Lond) 20. Offer PG, Boersma H. To make feeling of getting body weight: An effective hermeneutic research out-of adults’ explanations to own obesity. Couns Psychother Res 2005;5(3):212-20. DOI: 1690500310429. Choo J, Jeon S, Lee J. Gender variations in fitness-associated total well being of the abdominal obesity into the a good Korean inhabitants. BMJ Open 20-003954. Bolton MA, Lobben I, Tight TA. This new perception away from body picture with the diligent care and attention. Prim Care and attention Spouse J Clin Psychiatry 2010;12(2):722-34. DOI: /PCC. Meltzer AL, McNulty JK. Human anatomy visualize and marital satisfaction: research toward mediating part out of intimate regularity and you will sexual joy. J Fam Psychol 2011 April 1;24(2):156-64. DOI: /a001906. Pujols Y, Secure BN, Meston CM. The new association anywhere between sexual joy and body photo in females.
J Sex Med 2010;7(2 Pt 2):905-sixteen. DOI:/j. Ludwig J, Sanbonmatsu L, Gennetian L, Adam Age, Duncan GJ, Katz LF, ainsi que al. Neighborhoods, carrying excess fat, and you may all forms of diabetes–a good randomized social experiment. N Eng J Med 2011 Oct 20;365(16):1509-19. DOI: /NEJMsa1103216. Williams K. Has got the future of ination from intercourse, relationship, and psychological well-becoming. J Wellness Soc Behav 2014 Will get 12;44(4):470-87.
Add a Comment